next up previous
Next: SUPERVISED LEARNING Up: Probability Interpretation of Population Previous: INTRODUCTION

PROBABILITY ANALOGY

Consider a scalar variable x that represents some measurable external quantity. Suppose that sensory processing encodes the variable x over a population of cells such that each cell has a localized ``receptive field'' for values of x. For example, we could use a Gaussian shaped receptive field such as

where the standard deviation s determines the specificity and overlap of the receptive fields, and the means determine the centers. Then any value of x is represented as a local pattern of activity over the set .

Now, define to be a noisy measured value of x with additive independent random noise . Let the probability distribution of be equal to the receptive field shape . For example, if is as above, then let be Normal with variance . Then we have

In other words, each basis function output can be interpreted as the probability that the noisy measurement was in fact generated by the uncorrupted value . The value of for which is maximized is the maximum likelihood (ML) estimate of x given .

We can compute the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate of x given using Bayes' rule:

Note that this is proportional to if and are uniform. In this case, the set of 's gives the probability density of x for each measurement .

We can average the basis function outputs over multiple values of x to obtain the expected value:

 

and this expression gives a smoothed and subsampled version of . In particular, if the receptive fields are all the same shape so that , then equation 1 describes sampled values from the convolution and approximates . Thus the expected values give a sampled and smoothed approximation to the input probability density in a manner similar to Parzen Windows density estimation. ( can also be interpreted as a sampled but not smoothed version of .)

The above analogy provides the theoretical basis for the analysis of this type of population code. Note that it applies only to population codes described by local receptive fields. The noise term is an artificial theoretical construction that allows the analogy to be made. A receptive field in the population code corresponds to the noise distribution in the probability analogy, and a wider receptive field is equivalent to a higher noise variance.



next up previous
Next: SUPERVISED LEARNING Up: Probability Interpretation of Population Previous: INTRODUCTION



Terence D. Sanger
Mon Aug 21 18:36:58 EDT 1995